War Crimes Trials?

Obama aides are wary of taking any steps that would smack of political retribution. That's one reason they are reluctant to see high-profile investigations by the Democratic-controlled Congress or to greenlight a broad Justice inquiry (absent specific new evidence of wrongdoing). "If there was any effort to have war-crimes prosecutions of the Bush administration, you'd instantly destroy whatever hopes you have of bipartisanship," said Robert Litt, a former Justice criminal division chief during the Clinton administration. A new commission, on the other hand, could emulate the bipartisan tone set by Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton in investigating the 9/11 attacks. The 9/11 panel was created by Congress. An alternative model, floated by human-rights lawyer Scott Horton, would be a presidential commission similar to the one appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975 and headed by Nelson Rockefeller that investigated cold-war abuses by the CIA.”
Well, we certainly wouldn't want to see any "political retribution" now, would we? God forbid that we "destroy any hopes you may have of bipartisanship." They illegally invade and occupy Iraq, killing over 1.2 million Iraqis in the process, get 4,500 of our soldiers killed, torture and deprive prisoners of legal rights, illegally spy on Americans by the NSA and who knows who else, and spend $3 trillion on this goddamned war- and they're afraid of hurting someones feelings?! These "people" should be given the same sort of fair "trial" they gave Saddam Hussein, and you know how that ended...
0 Response to "War Crimes Trials?"
Post a Comment