"Quoi Bono? Lies, Damn Lies, and War"
"Iran Nuke Document Was Forged -
Just Like Iraqi "Yellow Cake" Document"
by George Washington
by George Washington
"Quoi bono?" Latin, "who benefits or gains" from this act?
"Former CIA official Philip Giraldi says that: "U.S. intelligence has concluded that the document published recently by the Times of London, which purportedly describes an Iranian plan to do experiments on what the newspaper described as a "neutron initiator" for an atomic weapon, is a fabrication."
Like the Nigerian "yellow cake" forgery, U.S. intelligence had to have known the Iranian document was a forgery, and yet failed to debunk either. Indeed, as "Time" points out, the yellow cake document: "had been checked out — and debunked — by U.S. intelligence a year before the President repeated it. Indeed, a claim that Iran is trying to buy uranium is now being made against Iran, just as it was with Iraq. Specifically, Associated Press - citing unnamed "diplomats" from an unnamed country - is reporting today that Iran is trying to obtain uranium. However, Iran says that it has 1,400 uranium mines (a senior IAEA official was allowed to visit one of the mines in 1992) - so why would Iran need to purchase more uranium from another country?"
The parallels go even further, since war against both countries were planned many years ago. Specifically:
• The decision to launch the Iraq war was made before 9/11.
• The decision to launch a war against Iran was made before 9/11.
• And false linkages between terrorists and both countries are being (or may still be) made. Specifically:
• A knowingly false linkage was made between Al Qaeda and Iraq, and - while most people forget this fact - that false linkage formed one of the main justifications for the war in Iraq.
• U.S. congressman Ron Paul stated that the government "is determined to have martial law", and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse". He also said "a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran".
• And former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation. He also told the Senate that the war on terror is "a mythical historical narrative".
• The decision to launch a war against Iran was made before 9/11.
• And false linkages between terrorists and both countries are being (or may still be) made. Specifically:
• A knowingly false linkage was made between Al Qaeda and Iraq, and - while most people forget this fact - that false linkage formed one of the main justifications for the war in Iraq.
• U.S. congressman Ron Paul stated that the government "is determined to have martial law", and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse". He also said "a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran".
• And former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation. He also told the Senate that the war on terror is "a mythical historical narrative".
- http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/12/iran-nuke-document-was-forged.html
So, quoi bono? Who really benefitted from the US invading Iraq? Who would benefit most from a war with Iran? The American people? You know better, or should. Look at a map of the Middle East. Who has oil and natural gas production and reserves? Who wants those resources? But you keep reminding yourself, Good Patriotic Flag-waver Citizen, that it's about "democracy" and the "war on terror," and not about oil, money, or geopolitical strategy while fighting a proxy war serving someone else's interests... -CP
0 Response to ""Quoi Bono? Lies, Damn Lies, and War""
Post a Comment